<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

    時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
    • 相關(guān)推薦

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Question:

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

      In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

      Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

      Required:

      In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

      Answer:

      The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

      There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

      Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

      When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

      It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

      Remedies for breach of contract

      (i) Specific performance

      It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

      (ii) Damages

      A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

    【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關(guān)文章:

    ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓(xùn)練試題03-19

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習(xí)試題03-19

    《論語》試題及答案04-19

    為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

    acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

    Indesign認(rèn)證試題及答案03-17

    excel操作試題及答案03-19

    photoshop試題附答案07-15

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 人妻少妇乱子伦精品| 9久久9久久精品| 国产精品igao视频网| 久久精品国产色蜜蜜麻豆| 欧美精品/日韩精品/国产精品| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久久| 精品一区二区三区免费观看| 久久国产精品99久久久久久老狼| 精品永久久福利一区二区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区中文精品 | 国产一区二区精品久久凹凸| 国产精品麻豆高清在线观看| 国产精品成人A区在线观看| 无码精品A∨在线观看中文| 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区不卡 | 亚洲精品国产va在线观看蜜芽| 99久久人人爽亚洲精品美女| 精品一区二区三区四区| 99精品在线播放| 国产成人精品精品欧美| 国产精品禁18久久久夂久| 久久这里只有精品18| 亚洲2022国产成人精品无码区| 亚洲国产人成精品| 伊在人亚洲香蕉精品区麻豆| 亚洲精品视频久久久| 欧美日韩综合精品| 亚洲精品成人片在线观看| 久久www免费人成精品香蕉| 精品亚洲欧美无人区乱码| 国产精品伊人久久伊人电影| 国产一区麻豆剧传媒果冻精品| 国产精品综合专区中文字幕免费播放| 在线精品视频播放| 国产精品美女久久久久AV福利 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久久久久久久| 午夜成人精品福利网站在线观看| 日本欧美国产精品第一页久久| 热综合一本伊人久久精品| 亚洲精品欧美二区三区中文字幕 |