<dfn id="w48us"></dfn><ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • <del id="w48us"></del>
    <ul id="w48us"></ul>
  • ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

    時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
    • 相關推薦

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Question:

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

      Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

      In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

      Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

      Required:

      In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

      Answer:

      The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

      There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

      Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

      When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

      It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

      Remedies for breach of contract

      (i) Specific performance

      It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

      (ii) Damages

      A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

    【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關文章:

    ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓練試題03-19

    2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習試題03-19

    《論語》試題及答案04-19

    為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

    acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

    Indesign認證試題及答案03-17

    excel操作試題及答案03-19

    photoshop試題附答案07-15

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品日韩AV在线播放| 国内精品手机在线观看视频| 国产在线精品无码二区| 国内精品久久久久久久coent| 亚洲精品少妇30p| 国产精品一区二区三区99| 国产成人精品免费午夜app| 中文字幕精品一区二区精品| 国产精品美女WWW爽爽爽视频| 91精品国产高清久久久久久io| 宅男在线国产精品无码| 精品一区二区三区色花堂| 秋霞久久国产精品电影院| 国产精品186在线观看在线播放| 亚洲精品网站在线观看不卡无广告| 国产高清在线精品一本大道| 国产精品黄网站| 97久久精品无码一区二区天美| 久久久久人妻一区精品色| 亚洲精品动漫免费二区| 另类国产精品一区二区| 国产内地精品毛片视频| 成人精品一区二区三区在线观看| 国产亚洲精品观看91在线| 97精品国产手机| 国内精品久久久久影院优| 亚洲AV无码国产精品色午友在线| 西瓜精品国产自在现线| 麻豆国产精品VA在线观看不卡| 精品福利一区二区三区精品国产第一国产综合精品 | 国产l精品国产亚洲区在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本 | 免费看一级毛片在线观看精品视频 | 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲九九 | 国产成人精品免费午夜app| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久狼| 四虎成人www国产精品| www夜片内射视频日韩精品成人 | 500av导航大全精品| 凹凸国产熟女精品视频app| 99久久精品国产麻豆|