- 相關(guān)推薦
量刑與刑的量化-兼論“電腦量刑”
【摘要】量刑題目長期以來被學(xué)術(shù)及司法界所忽略。理論上，我國刑事法沒有對量刑題目做細(xì)致的規(guī)定，而實(shí)踐中，法院將量刑題目并進(jìn)定罪的審理程序中一并考量，加上各地法院作法各異，造成量刑不透明和巨大的差異性。有人主張為了同一量刑采用電腦軟件程式化量刑諸因素。本文提出量刑并非刑的量化，不應(yīng)該僅僅以如何具體化刑期為中心。量刑實(shí)際反映社會對犯罪人終極評價的動態(tài)過程，理應(yīng)考慮更多因素，將量刑從定罪程序中獨(dú)立出來。 【關(guān)鍵詞】量刑 刑事司法 定罪 刑罰 恢復(fù)性司法 【英文摘要】Sentencing has long been neglected by both legal scholars and the judiciary．Neither the Criminal substantive nor procedure：law elaborates on this issue．In practice，the courts combine sentencing and guilty-finding．into one process．Sentencing has in fact demonstrated huge discrepancies from place to place due to variances in practices of diffrent localities and non-transparency of the process．Some propose to unifY the sentencing practice by utilizing computer programs．However，this *** points out that the sentencing is not a mere process of computing the final sentence，but rather a dynamic process of balancing all factors related to the criminal offense and of fender and *** a final decision of the penalty．Therefore．the sentencing process should be separated from the guilty-finding one． 【英文關(guān)鍵詞】Sentencing；Criminal Justice；conviction；penalty；restorative justice【量刑與刑的量化-兼論“電腦量刑”】相關(guān)文章：
量刑建議權(quán)的司法化探索12-30
對我國刑事司法中量刑均衡的思考03-20
關(guān)于設(shè)立量刑建議制度的探討（上）03-24
“醉酒駕駛”量刑考慮情節(jié)淺探02-28
談侵犯著作權(quán)罪的定罪量刑12-26
論刑證據(jù)的質(zhì)證方式與被告人權(quán)利的保護(hù)03-07
王佐：論物流產(chǎn)業(yè)研究—兼論物流企業(yè)的界定03-21